Abstract: |
Traditional field measurements (TFMs) for assessing the diversity of tree species in forests, while valuable, are inherently labor-intensive, time-consuming, and often impractical for vast and remote forest areas. In light of these challenges, the integration of high resolution remote sensing datasets, such as airborne laser scanning (ALS) point clouds and color infrared (CIR) images, emerges as a promising solution to overcome the limitations of TFMs. In the present study, the biodiversity indices were initially computed at plot levels based on TFMs and recognized individuals on the ALS and CIR datasets separately. Finally, a comparative analysis was conducted between the results obtained from our approach and those derived from TFMs. The study is conducted in the Bialowieza Forest (BF), a renowned UNESCO world heritage site recognized as an old growth forest. For effective management, the forest is categorized into three distinct parts: strict reserve (SR), nature reserve (NR), and managed forest (MF). A total of 570 sample plots, each covering an area of 500 m2 and previously surveyed for species, diameter at breast height (dbh), and height, were chosen in SR (168 plots), NR (199 plots) and MF (203 plots). Utilizing ALS and CIR datasets, 30 variables were extracted and employed as input for the RF algorithm to identify 12 genera of broadleaved and coniferous individuals within the BF in the previous study. We computed the biodiversity indices, including alpha diversity, beta diversity, gamma diversity, Simpson, Shannon-Wiener, density, dominance, and importance, using measurements derived from both TFMs and ALS+CIR datasets for the individuals that were observable from above (i.e., dominant and intermediate individuals). The findings revealed no significant differences in alpha diversity indices (Shannon-Wiener and Simpson) between TFMs (SR: 0.50, 0.32; NR: 1.17, 0.66; MF: 0.65, 0.36, respectively) and ALS+CIR datasets (SR: 1.27, 0.67; NR: 1.09, 0.66; MF: 1.19, 0.62, respective) across the three management types (p-value = 0.2435, 0.1828). Average beta diversity, computed from TFMs (0.69) and ALS+CIR (0.72) datasets, exhibited no statistically significant difference. Similarly, Wilcoxon rank test results indicated no distinction (p-value = 0.9047) between average gamma diversities derived from TFMs (2.10) and ALS+CIR (2.16) datasets. Notably, the top two species in terms of density, dominance, and importance were accurately identified using ALS+CIR datasets. In addition, principal component analysis (PCA) illustrated a robust correlation (~0.94) between PCA1 and PCA2 across both TFMs and ALS+CIR datasets, highlighting the consistency of diversity patterns among the various forest management types. The comparison of diversity indices between TFMs and ALS+CIR datasets across the distinct management types suggests that the high-resolution remote sensing approach provided comparable results to traditional field methods in capturing the diversity of tree species within these ecosystems. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the viability of utilizing ALS+CIR datasets for biodiversity assessment in the BF across various management types. Overall, the integration of ALS and CIR datasets emerges as a promising avenue for advancing our understanding of forest biodiversity and facilitating evidence-based decision-making for the conservation of biodiversity in old growth forests. |